In this article you will learn about the Analysis of Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace.” In this article, we will explore the essential ideas presented in the work by the German philosopher, Immanuel Kant. Additionally, we will examine some of his other significant works and their relevance in contemporary times.

Who was Immanuel Kant?

Immanuel Kant was a renowned German philosopher of the Enlightenment era, born in Konigsberg, East Prussia. His extensive and systematic works on epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, and western political philosophy are highly regarded.

As we delve into the analysis of “Perpetual Peace,” let us also reflect on some of his other critical works, such as

  • “Critique of Pure Reason” (1781)
  • “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” (1785)
  • “Critique of Practical Reason” (1788)
  • “Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Perspective” (1784)
  • “Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” (1784), and
  • “Conjectural Beginning of Human History” (1786).

Through these works, Kant presents various important ideas, such as his fundamental law of morality, the categorical imperative, which suggests that moral reasons should take precedence over all other reasons.

Understanding Kant’s ideas is critical to fully appreciate the significance of “Perpetual Peace” and its relevance in contemporary times.

It is important to understand that when we discuss “Perpetual Peace,” the idea of moral reasons overriding other sorts of reasons becomes significant in the context of achieving world peace. The categorical imperative is a universal ethical principle that suggests one should always respect the humanity in others and act only in accordance with rules that can be held for everyone. Therefore, transcendental idealism, which distinguishes between what we can experience and what we cannot, is a crucial tenet in Kant’s philosophy.

Kant’s contributions to nearly all areas of philosophy are significant, and his ideas on cosmopolitanism are particularly relevant in contemporary international relations and issues of globalization. The cosmopolitan perspective, which emerges from the combination of categorical imperative and transcendental idealism, has timeless significance in promoting world peace.

Kant believed that war was a result of an imbalance and reflected a disequilibrium in international relations. While wars are never desirable, they may lead to new conditions that are more balanced, thereby reducing the chances of new wars occurring and moving towards perpetual peace. It is essential to consider Kant’s ideas on war and peace to promote a more peaceful and just world.

Kant’s idea of perpetual peace is based on the notion that all states of the world slowly work towards a condition of balance and equilibrium.

The concept of perpetual peace was first used in the 18th century by Charles-Irene Castel de Saint-Pierre in his essay “Project for Perpetual Peace,” which was related to the Treaty of Utrecht and the Treaty of Yüksel.

However, the term became popular when Kant published his 1795 essay “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.”

Kant’s cosmopolitan perspective is of timeless significance in contemporary international relations, particularly in issues related to globalization and world peace. According to Kant, war reflects an imbalance and disequilibrium in international relations, and wars are never desirable. Wars can lead to new conditions in international relations, and sometimes, these new conditions are more balanced than the previous ones, which may lead to perpetual peace.

Kant’s paradigm in international relations is characterized by a tentative and exploratory approach that is keenly aware that all solutions involve trade-offs and imply certain courses. Kant believed in human progress and saw the march of progress as linked to world peace as destiny.

Kant’s ideas have played an important role in the formation of the League of Nations, the United Nations, and various experiments of supranational governance, such as the European Union.

For Kant, peace is not just about the absence of war; it requires the rule of just laws within the state, between states, and between states and foreigners at the global level. Individuals should join a state, and a just state should have certain characteristics. Kant also discusses the relationship between a state’s internal constitution and its external behavior towards other states and what forms the rule of law should take at the transnational level.

The essay presents some definite articles for perpetual peace among states, and it begins by noting that the natural state of humanity is not peaceful coexistence but rather war, or at least the unceasing threat of war. In order to establish a state in which there is no danger of hostilities, more than just the absence of hostilities is required. The definite articles proposed by Kant include:

  1. The civil constitution of every state should be republican. This means that the people should have a say in how their country is governed, and that the government should be accountable to the people.
  2. The law of nations shall be based on a federation of free states. This means that international law should be grounded in a federation of independent states, rather than in the dominance of one state over others.
  3. The rights of nations shall be based on a federation of free states. This means that the rights of nations should be based on a federation of independent states, rather than on the subjugation of one state to another.
  4. Standing armies shall be abolished in time of peace. This means that countries should not maintain large standing armies during times of peace, as they can be seen as a threat to other countries.
  5. National debts shall not be contracted with a view to the external friction of states. This means that countries should not take on debt for the purpose of waging war against other countries.
  6. No state shall interfere with the constitution or government of another state. This means that countries should respect the sovereignty of other countries and not try to impose their own political systems on them.
  7. No state shall use force to collect a debt. This means that countries should not use military force to collect debts from other countries.

As we delve into Kant’s ideas on perpetual peace, it becomes apparent that the balance between rationality and morality is crucial. Understanding the nature of human beings and the interconnectedness between individuals is integral to achieving peace. Kant’s faith in idealism and morality serves as a guiding principle towards this goal.

Furthermore, the idea of pledging support to one’s neighbor is significant in international cooperative arrangements and institutionalism. This concept is highlighted in Kant’s statement that “real security against outbreaks of war is something that has to be pledged to each person by his neighbor.”

Constitutions play a vital role in achieving perpetual peace. They come in various types, such as civil constitutions that govern the relations between individuals within a nation-state, international constitutions that govern the relations between nation-states, and a constitution of world citizenship that governs the relations between individuals and nation-states as citizens of a universal state of mankind.

Moreover, Kant emphasizes the importance of republicanism in the civil constitution of every state, and the law of nations is to be founded on a federation of free states. The heart of the idea of perpetual peace lies in the different types of constitutions that govern the relations amongst individuals and nation-states, and the moral obligation to pledge support to one’s neighbor for real security against outbreaks of war.

Emmanuel Kant argues that in the history of nature, good is the starting point because it is God’s work, while the history of freedom begins with badness because it is shaped by human actions. Another beautiful idea from Kant is the notion of cosmopolitanism, where a league of peace must be established to end all wars forever. This league is distinguished from a treaty of peace, which only seeks to stop one war. The power of morality is essential in guiding us towards achieving peace. Kant also emphasizes that without man’s potential for moral progress, the world would be in vain and have no final purpose.

Perpetual Peace also highlights the danger of standing armies, which constantly threaten other nations with war by appearing prepared for it. This leads to nations competing with each other in terms of the number of men under arms, creating a never-ending cycle.

The cost of maintaining peace becomes greater than that of a short war, making standing armies a cause of war and aggression that leads to burdening expenditures. Additionally, paying men to kill or be killed treats them as mere machines and tools, which is inconsistent with the rights of humanity.

As we examine the perspectives of Immanuel Kant in his seminal work Perpetual Peace, it becomes clear that he elaborates on the cosmopolitan perspective and ideas, beginning with the concept of universal history.

Kant presents a peace program to be implemented by governments, and the preliminary articles of the essay outline the steps that should be taken with respect to the issue of world peace. These include the stipulation that no secret treaty of peace shall be held valid in which there is a tacitly reserved matter for a future war; that no independent state, large or small, shall come under the dominion of another state by inheritance, exchange, purchase, or donation; and that standing armies shall in time be totally abolished, and that national debts shall not be contracted with a view to the external friction of states.

Additionally, no state shall by force interfere with the constitution or government of another state, and no state shall, during war, permit such acts of hostility that would make mutual confidence in the subsequent peace impossible, such as the employment of assassins or poisoners, among others.

The three definitive articles provide not only a mere cessation of hostilities but also lead to a foundation on which to build peace. The civil constitution of each state shall be republican, the law of nations shall be founded on a federation of free states, and the rights of men as citizens of the world should be limited to the conditions of universal hospitality.

It is crucial to understand that Kantian perspectives not only lay the foundation of a cosmopolitan framework of world peace and democracy but also point out the essence of morals and the faith in morality and reason to lead towards peace and betterment for all.


References that provide additional insight into Kant’s practical philosophy include –

  • Onara O’Neil’s work Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy from Cambridge University Press
  • Henry Allison’s work Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense from Yale University Press, and Practical Philosophy, an edited volume by Mary Gregor.

Categorized in: